Antismite the_J. Not like we have any leads yet, other than Leth, who's probably either a really bad wolf, a really bad Madman, or somebody of any alignment who wants us to think he's a madman.
A really good wolf*Antismite the_J. Not like we have any leads yet, other than Leth, who's probably either a really bad wolf, a really bad Madman, or somebody of any alignment who wants us to think he's a madman.
Final answer: I have no clue.Make up your minds, people! Do I need to start putting dog hair in everyone's beds?
Sent from my Puzzle Box of Yogg-Saron using Tapatalk 2
Where are you getting this dog hair from? I thought you said you loved hairless dogs?Make up your minds, people! Do I need to start putting dog hair in everyone's beds?
Sent from my Puzzle Box of Yogg-Saron using Tapatalk 2
*gasps* Wolf!Last time I bluntly admitted that I was a wolf, I was being more subtle than that
Not really a antismite when he has two other votes on him.antismite pyure
Well no nobody...hmmm
Nod this is looking more and more blatant.Not really a antismite when he has two other votes on him.
There is technically a nobody... Antismite VikeStep
oh sorry I didn't realizeNot really a antismite when he has two other votes on him.
Nope...antismite trajing
I really need a tally
Well they're the same odds. If we pick a random person we have a 1/players chance of lynching a wolf. If we let RNJS decide we have a 1/players chanceSo is the master plan here to let RNJS decide the lynch? RNJS being my clever portmanteau of the day.
I have to say I like the odds of this better than the odds of trying to accurately lynch a wolf on D1.
You removed the human element entirely dude. The plausible argument is that if the players pick a random person, they're basing it off info.Well they're the same odds. If we pick a random person we have a 1/players chance of lynching a wolf. If we let RNJS decide we have a 1/players chance