Unleashed lags with ok fps?

[Omix]

Hi!

I got problem with unleashed pack. When entering a world, i'm able to check my surrounding with spinning my character. Everything seems ok, working with 25-30 fps according to F3 status.
However, as soon as i start moving forward, it kind of hops forward in a lot of small steps, all landscape stutters against me, looking like crap. Meanwhile doing this, the FPS remain stable at the same level, around 30.

It's a freshly built computer that is meant to be used for making my kid to play minecraft. It's built by secondhanded parts, but should be descent enough for minecraft. A good motherboard and CPU, 4GB mem. The rest of the minecrafters here in the house runs with Win 7 64 bit, while this "new" computer runs with Vista 32 bit. The computers bottleneck is the gfx card, using the motherboard built in atm.

Memory remains around 40-50% of the 1 GB i'm giving java, wich is also ofc 32 bit version.

Ultimate hasn't got this problem, it runs ok and with optifine runs fine.

 

[frederikam]

Try posting a log. Also try to set the game to power-saver mode and see if that helps

 

[Omix]

Hmm posting a log? Thought the log was only created when the game actually crashes?

I haven't tested power saver mode, but i did try to shrink the gfx settings, and also putting it into max fps mode.

 

[Omix]

http://pastebin.com/bhLyGQXK[DOUBLEPOST=1377935914][/DOUBLEPOST]There you go!

 

[Omix]

A lil more information. When sneaking forward in Z-axis, and using F3 stats, I can clearly see that every time one block is passed and the Z-coord flips to next digit, it stops briefly, and then catches up. Within the block, i can sneak around with no issues at all. FPS need correction tho, it's more between 15-25 when in the base.

 

[frederikam]

This log doesn't mention anything suspicious, did you load up the word or was it at the menu screen? I didn't see anything about loading a world after loading all textures. Try switching max fps to powersaver.

 

[UniZero]

Remove optifine and try adding these JVM arguments into the launcher. You do understand that running vanilla minecraft and a heavily modded minecraft is completely different. How well does the system run vanilla? I would also use the Ultra D5 of optifine because it is the most stable one.

 

[Omix]

Remove optifine and try adding these JVM arguments into the launcher. You do understand that running vanilla minecraft and a heavily modded minecraft is completely different. How well does the system run vanilla? I would also use the Ultra D5 of optifine because it is the most stable one.

Yes, i do know the difference. I have never said anything about vanilla minecraft. I did mention the ultimate FTB pack though. Never tried out vanilla minecraft on that computer. FTB ultimate runs somewhat ok on the system, good enough with optifine installed. On FTB ultimate without optifine, it runs quite slow, but with no sign of these "passing block" lags. I do know how a laggy minecraft feels like, and this isn't that. A laggy minecraft in my experience runs very sluggish when looking around fast, and mouse movements seem delayed and unexact. Here i don't fin anything of that. Looking around is fast and good, with a stable fps around 20-ish, often up to 30. Moving aroun dis ok as well, until you enter next block, and it lags, catches up and is fine until next block.

No know issues with 32 bit systems and unleashed?

 

[UniZero]

Yes, i do know the difference. I have never said anything about vanilla minecraft. I did mention the ultimate FTB pack though. Never tried out vanilla minecraft on that computer. FTB ultimate runs somewhat ok on the system, good enough with optifine installed. On FTB ultimate without optifine, it runs quite slow, but with no sign of these "passing block" lags. I do know how a laggy minecraft feels like, and this isn't that. A laggy minecraft in my experience runs very sluggish when looking around fast, and mouse movements seem delayed and unexact. Here i don't fin anything of that. Looking around is fast and good, with a stable fps around 20-ish, often up to 30. Moving aroun dis ok as well, until you enter next block, and it lags, catches up and is fine until next block.

No know issues with 32 bit systems and unleashed?

Oh just noticed using the build in gfx card then yeah that will be a problem. A minimum 25fps is considered a playable fps. You also may want to try and change the priority of the cpu cores when it is running as that may help as well.

A 64bit os really is needed because you can't allocate any more than 1gb of ram in the launcher.

 

[Omix]

Hmm shouldn't be a memory issue as i stated it never reaches much above 50% used. At least not until mem leaks start to flourish, but it's a later thing.

Our kids here are hardened with laggy minecrafting, so they think it's blazing fast at 25 fps, compared to what they use now.

On a more serious track, does the gfx card do that much in this game so it's reason for installing one? Thought i could go without the extra cost, as it was claimed to be a fairly good gfx card (for being a built in one) on this mother board.

No lags in opening chests etc, nor is it when using NEI. Only moving.

BTW, the JVM link you posted seemed to be 64-bit stuff only?

 

[UniZero]

Hmm shouldn't be a memory issue as i stated it never reaches much above 50% used. At least not until mem leaks start to flourish, but it's a later thing.

Our kids here are hardened with laggy minecrafting, so they think it's blazing fast at 25 fps, compared to what they use now.

On a more serious track, does the gfx card do that much in this game so it's reason for installing one? Thought i could go without the extra cost, as it was claimed to be a fairly good gfx card (for being a built in one) on this mother board.

No lags in opening chests etc, nor is it when using NEI. Only moving.

BTW, the JVM link you posted seemed to be 64-bit stuff only?

Oops so it is. I have a Radeon 6850 myself and cost, in UK pounds £80, which runs it fine. I would certainly recommend using a dedicated card for gaming anyway as integrated cards are not the best for gaming.

Also the fact that you stated that it was a second hand system means the gfx card will be old.

 

[Omix]

Oops so it is. I have a Radeon 6850 myself and cost, in UK pounds £80, which runs it fine. I would certainly recommend using a dedicated card for gaming anyway as integrated cards are not the best for gaming.

Also the fact that you stated that it was a second hand system means the gfx card will be old.

Motherboard and mems are fresh new, rest is "old". Roughly meaning: Old scrapped chassi, with the existing power supply, dvd reader and cooling. A used CPU + cooling. A used HDD and other misc. All picked together from a computer store, installed and tested in store, from my requirements that is should be enough to play minecraft. Here i forgot to mention to the guy that it was the FTB minecraft and not the vanilla, hence the question if i should need a gfx card or not to leap over the vanilla-modded difference in requirements.. I.e i want an answer if the problem i encounter is due to the lack of external gfx board or not. My conclusion based on the results of my own testing was that it should be enough gfx power, as FTB ultimate runs ok, with no tendence of the block chugs (even if it's somewhat sluggish and need optifine to run ok).

No other games was mentioned, as i know i'm not making a hard core gamer computer out of a pile of second hand stuff and a built in gfx board. Minecraft however has a little out of normal hardware requirements, as it's not really that tough on gfx, but on CPU and mem.