The Werewolf has returned!!! (Game Thread)
- Thread starter Staxed
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Hi, it's your friendly neighborhood raven here to remind you that you can only hotlink direct imgur links, not links to imgur pages. Stay dead, kids. Raven out.
Fuck you raven don't tell me how to live my life, you're dead so you obviously didn't live yours right.
The "whisper" is obviously a clue. I can think of a few reasons we heard it:
1) a "victim" of the wolf may have been permitted to gasp out the name of their attacker. We're not doing so well right now, so it might have been the GM trying to stop us from wiping ourselves out in just 3 days. Since we now have 2 dead seers, I suppose a ghostly whisper isn't completely out of the ordinary?
2) a wolf may have whispered the name as a red herring - a clue meant to mislead us Into lynching yet another innocent. I didn't read anything about that mechanic in the rules post, however, at least in the roles.
3) some yet-unknown mechanic (unlikely)
1) a "victim" of the wolf may have been permitted to gasp out the name of their attacker. We're not doing so well right now, so it might have been the GM trying to stop us from wiping ourselves out in just 3 days. Since we now have 2 dead seers, I suppose a ghostly whisper isn't completely out of the ordinary?
2) a wolf may have whispered the name as a red herring - a clue meant to mislead us Into lynching yet another innocent. I didn't read anything about that mechanic in the rules post, however, at least in the roles.
3) some yet-unknown mechanic (unlikely)
You'd be surprised how many times GMs have used unknown mechanics. But still, anything I, or anyone says really could be lies or truth.[DOUBLEPOST=1397373191][/DOUBLEPOST]Still it could be an unknown rabid wolf debug to go along with the infection that he sometimes cries out a name, maybe as in his Rabid form he got confused as to who was there, or just wanted to turn people away from him and cause commotion. We may never know.
Let's hope that there's not a rabid wolf - with a start of less than a dozen people, more than 2 werewolves would basically be a death sentence for the non-werewolves. I'm hoping that since the post with the rules and roles was before we knew how many players...er...visitors we'd have in the mansion, the numbers may have been tweaked to match what we ended up with.
Well, now I feel like a douche. Sorry, but, well, Jus2beast was PRETTY suspicious.
I'm starting to think back to that incredible game we had way back when, in which Eunomiac, who to this day cannot seem to be contacted, was hiding behind very long, well-thought-out posts, pretending to be the drunkard, who could steal powers for a night, and very elaborately so. I seemed to be the only one who managed to work out that he was the werewolf, as he had turned everyone else against me because he knew that I knew he was a werewolf. To this day, I still say I told you so.
So, this might be wrong, as I have little evidence for it, and I'm sorry if I am, but:
I vote to lynch Larmonade.
I doubt it would be a good idea for others just to vote for him because I am, so please, don't just jump on teh band wagon this time. I want to get a villager win for bloody once -_-
I'm starting to think back to that incredible game we had way back when, in which Eunomiac, who to this day cannot seem to be contacted, was hiding behind very long, well-thought-out posts, pretending to be the drunkard, who could steal powers for a night, and very elaborately so. I seemed to be the only one who managed to work out that he was the werewolf, as he had turned everyone else against me because he knew that I knew he was a werewolf. To this day, I still say I told you so.
So, this might be wrong, as I have little evidence for it, and I'm sorry if I am, but:
I vote to lynch Larmonade.
I doubt it would be a good idea for others just to vote for him because I am, so please, don't just jump on teh band wagon this time. I want to get a villager win for bloody once -_-
Ah...nobody voting for me? I mean I was basically trying to get 2 villagers lynched...if I were you I would start voting on me....but...
Also, I think that the whisper was basically exedra getting infected. Or exedra infecting someone. Anyway, I think that the most suspicious person besides me is Larmonade since he is always posting increadibly useful stuff that may lead to us thinking the way he wants. Just saying. Plus I don't know if I'm gonna be online for much longer, so I have to vote on someone...sorry guys...
Vote (not locked): Larmonade
EDIT: Ninja'd
Also, I think that the whisper was basically exedra getting infected. Or exedra infecting someone. Anyway, I think that the most suspicious person besides me is Larmonade since he is always posting increadibly useful stuff that may lead to us thinking the way he wants. Just saying. Plus I don't know if I'm gonna be online for much longer, so I have to vote on someone...sorry guys...
Vote (not locked): Larmonade
EDIT: Ninja'd
Here's a theory someone came up with, from a convo where someone thought you were a wolf, based on them thinking you getting those two innocents lynched was suspicious. It contains no role proof or anything game breaking. I will not disclose the person(s) who were in the PM. Think whatever you may of it.
[DOUBLEPOST=1397383694][/DOUBLEPOST]I found it worth discussing with other players.
Sure it would be possible. If you really think I'm a wolf vote for me. I can even change my vote to lynch myself and proove I'm no wolf. I just don't think we have time for it.
EDIT: Hmmm, I kinda just found something strange in that theory. Why would I fear that Not_Steve had a power? I mean, he couldn't have used it. Plus, I wasn't here on day one.
I received a question via PM and decided I would clarify this in the thread just in case.
Regarding roles and if there can be multiples:
Villagers - multiple allowed
Werewolves - multiple allowed
All other roles are limited to 1.
Roles were decided via random chance (random.org).
Regarding roles and if there can be multiples:
Villagers - multiple allowed
Werewolves - multiple allowed
All other roles are limited to 1.
Roles were decided via random chance (random.org).
Okay, so I guess the first thing I need to do is defend myself, if for no other reason than to preserve the human/werewolf balance - keep in mind that it's not "last man standing wins" - if the next majority of players contains more werewolves than humans, they win by default.
I came out "swinging" with my role-playing because I didn't see other players doing as much talking as I thought was needed. I saw a bunch of one-line votes and thought "gee...can't do much with this" and decided that I needed to, at the very least, start up the conversation. Most of the 10 player+ games I've been in have had at least one or two wall-o-text guys. If you check my post history beyond just this game, you'll see that posting a crazy-sized wall of text isn't out of the ordinary for me. But I digress.
I've explained all of my actions up to this point as best as I could. I don't think I've cast any votes without at least a bit of explanation, nor have I cast any votes until after it was well-established what other folks were gonna do. Because I'm the mayor, I'm the tie-breaker, and while it's not a super-strong ability, it would totally suck to have that ability activated by accident. I've definitely played games of mafia/werewolf where a double-vote villager or a mayor or somebody cast a vote arbitrarily and ended up sealing a player's fate earlier than they'd hoped. So I admit to having been vocal, but I hope I've also been transparent and logical.
Even if I can't convince you all not to lynch me, I wanna make sure that my thoughts/notes about all the players are out there so that if humans manage to survive yet another day, maybe the werewolves still won't win (bolded names are those that are sill alive):
Kayla Sharp: She voted for the same (jnnocent) guy two times in a row. Her reasoning was based on reading each player's posts and gather ing details that seem "off", but at the time of her explanation of such, Goreae had only made one post that was fairly innocuous. Voting for someone twice in a row based on a single post about owning a flower shop seems suspicious.
Exedra: On day one, voted "no lynch," but on day two, voted to lynch the seer, Jus2Beast. Being simply mislead to vote for an innocent villager is understandable, but having your name whispered at the scene of the next crime is super-duper suspicous. Just sayin'.
dgdas9: Has had several kinda complicated theories on what's going on that confused me a bit, but I guess other people believed them. In this post, where he responded to my erroneous report about Jus2Beast's Private message, he additionally said that Jus2Beast had told him that he hadn't started a conversation with me. My mistake was just basically a misreading in a moment of haste on a mobile device...but it seems strange to claim that in your correspondance with an indivisual, they specifically also said that they hadn't spoken with some other player...
Among the other players, I have yet to discern any strange patterns of behavior...but it's late at night, and I'm pretty drunk (just like Eunomiac in The_j485's story :O SUSPICIOUS). I'll check in after I get a good night's sleep and whatnot. I'm not gonna cast any votes before that.
I came out "swinging" with my role-playing because I didn't see other players doing as much talking as I thought was needed. I saw a bunch of one-line votes and thought "gee...can't do much with this" and decided that I needed to, at the very least, start up the conversation. Most of the 10 player+ games I've been in have had at least one or two wall-o-text guys. If you check my post history beyond just this game, you'll see that posting a crazy-sized wall of text isn't out of the ordinary for me. But I digress.
I've explained all of my actions up to this point as best as I could. I don't think I've cast any votes without at least a bit of explanation, nor have I cast any votes until after it was well-established what other folks were gonna do. Because I'm the mayor, I'm the tie-breaker, and while it's not a super-strong ability, it would totally suck to have that ability activated by accident. I've definitely played games of mafia/werewolf where a double-vote villager or a mayor or somebody cast a vote arbitrarily and ended up sealing a player's fate earlier than they'd hoped. So I admit to having been vocal, but I hope I've also been transparent and logical.
Even if I can't convince you all not to lynch me, I wanna make sure that my thoughts/notes about all the players are out there so that if humans manage to survive yet another day, maybe the werewolves still won't win (bolded names are those that are sill alive):
- dwappo - voted to lynch nobody, and then Jus2Beast.
- Not_Steve - the drunk seer - voted to lynch Jus2Beast and then killed in night two.
- Strikingwolf - the hunter - voted to lynch nobody, and then Goreae
- goreae - the bodygueard - voted to lynch Kayla Sharp, and then Jus2Beast
- Exedra - voted to lynch nobody, and then Jus2Beast
- the_j485 - voted to lynch Jus2Beast on day 2
- dgdas9 - voted to lynch Jus2Beast on day 2
- Qazplm601 - voted to lynch nobody, and then Goreae
- Kayla sharp - voted to lynch Goreae, and then Goreae
- Larmonade - Voted to lynch nobody, and then Goreae
- Jus2beast - The seer - Voted to lynch nobody, and then Kayla Sharp
Kayla Sharp: She voted for the same (jnnocent) guy two times in a row. Her reasoning was based on reading each player's posts and gather ing details that seem "off", but at the time of her explanation of such, Goreae had only made one post that was fairly innocuous. Voting for someone twice in a row based on a single post about owning a flower shop seems suspicious.
Exedra: On day one, voted "no lynch," but on day two, voted to lynch the seer, Jus2Beast. Being simply mislead to vote for an innocent villager is understandable, but having your name whispered at the scene of the next crime is super-duper suspicous. Just sayin'.
dgdas9: Has had several kinda complicated theories on what's going on that confused me a bit, but I guess other people believed them. In this post, where he responded to my erroneous report about Jus2Beast's Private message, he additionally said that Jus2Beast had told him that he hadn't started a conversation with me. My mistake was just basically a misreading in a moment of haste on a mobile device...but it seems strange to claim that in your correspondance with an indivisual, they specifically also said that they hadn't spoken with some other player...
Among the other players, I have yet to discern any strange patterns of behavior...but it's late at night, and I'm pretty drunk (just like Eunomiac in The_j485's story :O SUSPICIOUS). I'll check in after I get a good night's sleep and whatnot. I'm not gonna cast any votes before that.
Last edited: