Siege of the Wolves | Game Thread

  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
1) I agree that RNG in ww is lame. I prefer "you may use your skill every third night" to "your skill works 33% of the time."
2) Starting with armored was a bit sketchy. I assumed it was two priest-armors plus armor-trader dying.
3) It could have been a wolf getting three armors, I wonder if you would have complained then :p

Live and learn; we'll build on it for the next game.
 
I would. unfairness is unfair on either side.
It wouldn't feel like a victory unlike previous games.

That "starting with armor" is still RNG.

Sum up, the armor concept is not good. It extends the time of the game, giving the villagers time to use their powers. Wolves couldn't do anything meanwhile.
 
SpwnX said:
I would. unfairness is unfair on either side.
It wouldn't feel like a victory unlike previous games.

That "starting with armor" is still RNG.

Sum up, the armor concept is not good. It extends the time of the game, giving the villagers time to use their powers. Wolves couldn't do anything meanwhile.
Click to expand...
VikeStep had armoured. Goreae got armoured too.
 
Not as outstanding as 3 armors on a single person.
Yet, the time extender is not good when the wolves have no power.
 
SpwnX said:
I would. unfairness is unfair on either side.
It wouldn't feel like a victory unlike previous games.

That "starting with armor" is still RNG.

Sum up, the armor concept is not good. It extends the time of the game, giving the villagers time to use their powers. Wolves couldn't do anything meanwhile.
Click to expand...

You could have killed someone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 016Nojr
Jus2beast said:
You could have killed someone else.
Click to expand...
Let me sum this situation and its frustrations up for you:
Night 1: Let's kill bachman! Nope, armour.
Night 2: Let's try again now the armor is gone! Nope, more armour.
Night 3: He certainly can't have any more armour. Let's kill him now! Nope, still armor.
Night 4: Frak this, he's god. let's just murder pyure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xTordX and LivingAngryCheese
goreae said:
Let me sum this situation and its frustrations up for you:
Night 1: Let's kill bachman! Nope, armour.
Night 2: Let's try again now the armor is gone! Nope, more armour.
Night 3: He certainly can't have any more armour. Let's kill him now! Nope, still armor.
Night 4: Frak this, he's god. let's just murder pyure.
Click to expand...

After night 2 I would have gone for someone else ;P
 
  • Like
Reactions: xTordX, 016Nojr and LivingAngryCheese
Still doesnt change the fact that he would last for two more nights if we were to target him later on.
Also, he was the guy that was proved innocent. Killing him was the first priority. If we target someone else he can continue scavenging information. And he did, for 5 nights. Duh.
At that point the seer and him had information about everybody.
 
SpwnX said:
Still doesnt change the fact that he would last for two more nights if we were to target him later on.
Also, he was the guy that was proved innocent. Killing him was the first priority. If we target someone else he can continue scavenging information. And he did, for 5 nights. Duh.
Click to expand...

Luck of the draw I guess :/
 
I was the doctor BTW. Bringing back bachman was the ultimate power play. After that me and him started to contact Nojr and got evidence he was the drunk seer before and is now the regular seer ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 016Nojr
We were screwed almost from the get-go then, huh? Blasted Random Noodle Garbage.

My Partially-Unfounded Zeroth Rule of Werewolf: Never put any trust in Vikestep, or luck.
o00ooooo000o00ooo0
 
  • Like
Reactions: xTordX and 016Nojr
Next time identify the doctor before the villagers do and get him to protect you.

Its not like the doc knows who's who. Someone has to talk him into providing protection.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom