FTB Infinity Evolved Expert; Alternative for Nuclear Control?

[Doktor KlingeL]

Hellow fellow FTB Minecraft Players,
I hope you have a good day totay!

I want to set up an IC2 Nuclear Reactor. I always used Nuclear Control 2 to build it safe but in Expert Mode you can not craft the "Reactor Sensor Location Card" and some other things which would be very nice to have. Is there an alternative in this modpack?


Greetings

 

[dragonmaster0283]

Im pretty sure you can craft it as I have it in my world. You can't make the card, have to make the kit. The kit turns into the card when you use it.

 

[Doktor KlingeL]

Thank you for the information! It was a long time since I last played Minecraft, hehe.

Do someone know if there is a IC2 Reactor planner? I searched for some hours but could not find one. Either the homepage is not aviable or the files are not found.

 

[ChemE]

There is now that IC2 has become IC2 experimental in all the packs we play: https://github.com/MauveCloud/Ic2ExpReactorPlanner/releases

 

[Doktor KlingeL]

I messed around with the IC2ExPReactorPlanner but I did not get any good results.
I want to make a NOX Fuel Reactor, does anyone have a setup at hand which would give me around 3000 to 8000 eu/t without exploding immediately?

 

[ChemE]

I messed around with the IC2ExPReactorPlanner but I did not get any good results.
I want to make a NOX Fuel Reactor, does anyone have a setup at hand which would give me around 3000 to 8000 eu/t without exploding immediately?

I'm not aware of any designs that put out that much power. This is the MOX design I always run and it is the most efficient design that I know of.
0C0A0C0A0C0A0C0A0C0A141414061414140A0C0A0C0A050A0C0A0C0A0C0A1406140A0C0A141414140C141414140A0C0A0C0A0C0A0C0A
800EU/t@16x (2 quad and 1 dual)

Make sure to set the temperature of all components and the hull both to 7,500 in order to get correct results. MOX reactors are run with blazing hot hulls and components that do not take heat from the hull.

 

[GreenZombie]

These MOX designs are both I think @MigukNamja's
EU/t and efficiency are taken relative to an operating temperature of 75%, and both can be automated trivially using item pipes with filtered insertion and removal rules:

090C090C0C090C09001409140A0A14091400090C0A05050A0C0900090C0A05050A0C09001409140A0A14091400090C090C0C090C0900
640EU/t @16x (4 dual)

0A140A140A140A140A060A0C0A0C0A0C0A060A140A140A0C0A140A0C0A0C0A060A0C0A0C0A140A140A140A140A060A0C0A0C0A0C0A06
1200EU/t @12x (5 quad)

 

[ChemE]

Here is my easily automated design:
0C0A0C0A0C0A0C0A0C0914141406141414090C090C1406140C090C090C09140A14090C09141414141414141414090C090C090C090C09
640EU/t@16x (2 quad)

EDIT: I took a second and third look at @MigukNamja 's four double design that puts out the same power at the same efficiency as my 2 quad... His is superior to mine in every way. Never build mine just build his. Well done on that design sir!