No offense, but it doesn't sound like you ever did the math on that... besides, using
overPower
ed Converters as the basis of your value considerations is highly questionable, in my humble opinion
I've found statements that start with "no offence" generally imply offence should be taken, so please forgive me if my reply is a little defensive
Of course my previous post was just my opinion, which I thought was clear but never mind. I have always liked the idea of steam turbines but the steel cost in construction, the steel cost for ongoing maintenance and the need for many units to get a reasonable eu output (on top of the boiler construction and running cost) has made them something I've never bothered to try because the juice doesn't seem worth the squeeze, imo. 2 dedicated 36hp boilers and 6 steam turbines to get hv eu output right? That being said it is the ongoing maintenance cost that is the deal breaker though, its the stick that breaks the camel's back.
Regarding power converters I never said one way or the other how I feel about their use or balance, I just answered SS's question which was what converts steam to eu, I felt the turbines required more info because of their extra costs.
If you're interested it turns out I do like power converters for steam>mj as I like that they're more compact than 18 industrial steam engines, they're also a way lot cheaper but it is the compactness that is the factor here for me (I'd be fine with it if a converter setup had similar resource cost as 18 industrial steam engines0 and of course the steam input>mj output is exactly the same 720mb>144mj. I don't generally use converters for steam>eu, although I have done on a couple of occasions; when I first tried the power converters mod and to make a couple of titanium ingots because wanting a buildcraft quarry forced me to use ic2 (and an unnamed addon) which I felt was a little unreasonable at the time.