Big Reactor Not Producing What it Should

[trajano080]

According to the speadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0An54qOfSiXfJdEcyaHAxWURaZTR2eEpEWEFaU0xydXc#gid=0), A 5x5 Reactor with 4 fuel rods in the corners cooled with Cryotheum, should produce 2100 RF/t, however, my reactor, which is set up exactly the same way only produces arround 710 RF/t.

 

[Padfoote]

Is it at the correct heat level? And it's possible your configs aren't at the same level as the ones used in creating that spreadsheet.

 

[trajano080]

Is it at the correct heat level? And it's possible your configs aren't at the same level as the ones used in creating that spreadsheet.

Well, it could be the configs, but if they are the same then it shoudn't be a heat problem since I set it up the same way (or does it work that way? this is the first time I use this mod)
Edit: I just looked at the configs. My power production multiplier is set at 1.0, should I change it to 3.0? (700x3=2100)

 

[Padfoote]

Edit: I just looked at the configs. My power production multiplier is set at 1.0, should I change it to 3.0? (700x3=2100)

That's up to you and what you want. I personally keep it at 1, but I've heard of cases where it gets cranked up to around 8 or so.

 

[midi_sec]

not if you don't want to.

the spreadsheet is still accurate, aside the rf/t numbers.

 

[Not_Steve]

That's up to you and what you want. I personally keep it at 1, but I've heard of cases where it gets cranked up to around 8 or so.

In RR it was at 11 for a while just to keep it competitive with atomic science

 

[trajano080]

That's up to you and what you want. I personally keep it at 1, but I've heard of cases where it gets cranked up to around 8 or so.

I think I'm keeping it at 1, I might bump it up later

 

[Pyure]

I think I'm keeping it at 1, I might bump it up later

Make a reactorCraft version Then disable it when it hurts your performance, but at least stand in awe of the RF output for a while.[DOUBLEPOST=1397482455][/DOUBLEPOST]IIRC I think you're already familiar with them, but a small fission reactor (3x3 cores, no cooling required) can output 160,000 rf/t.

 

[trajano080]

Make a reactorCraft version Then disable it when it hurts your performance, but at least stand in awe of the RF output for a while.[DOUBLEPOST=1397482455][/DOUBLEPOST]IIRC I think you're already familiar with them, but a small fission reactor (3x3 cores, no cooling required) can output 160,000 rf/t.

No, I actually hadn't tried them, thx for the suggestion . They might be too cheaty for my liking, but I will definitely try them out.

 

[The Skeptical Tech]

Make a reactorCraft version Then disable it when it hurts your performance, but at least stand in awe of the RF output for a while.[DOUBLEPOST=1397482455][/DOUBLEPOST]IIRC I think you're already familiar with them, but a small fission reactor (3x3 cores, no cooling required) can output 160,000 rf/t.

Me want.

I think I might try out a small fission reactor.

 

[Pyure]

No, I actually hadn't tried them, thx for the suggestion . They might be too cheaty for my liking, but I will definitely try them out.

The hefty output has some drawbacks. Its a bit of a cpu resource-hog, and translating the output into RF is a pain because a given RoC-to-RF dynamo (Rotational Dynamo) cannot produce more than 12k RF/T, which means splitting it 15 or 16 ways.

See my screenshots on http://forum.feed-the-beast.com/threads/how-to-produce-massive-rf.43501/page-3 if you're really interested.

 

[KhrFreak]

I'm pretty sure I heard somewhere the default multiplier in the config is set to 3, its only in ftb packs that they have it toned down to 1 which may be your problem


Sent from my GT-N8010 using Tapatalk