Aluminium vs Aluminum

  • Please make sure you are posting in the correct place. Server ads go here and modpack bugs go here
  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord

DaveSW

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
103
0
0
Xycraft blocks not only look spiffy, but mobs cant spawn on them. I haven't tested it in the nether, but if it works for pigmen as well, that would be a much better way to prevent them from spawning on tracks.
 

raiju

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
448
-2
0
If anyone was wondering about how explosion resistant the stronger XY blocks are btw (plates/shields) they're effectively stone against a nuke. If you want to be nuke-proof stick to iridium-reinforced stone or titanium blocks.
 

DoctorOr

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
1,735
0
0
Absolutely do not want GT-Al to be matched to Xy-Al. The intended rarity of GTs version (its not even a direct ore and must be processed from other things) is in serious conflict with the actual commonality of Xycrafts version.

This is the weakness of dictionary matching of ores, and can already see the issue between GT and RP rubies and emeralds. RP expects, and gives an approprite valie in crafting while GT expects they are far rarer and gives them such value.

Its as if some mod declared something called diamonds to spawn in one of every three blocks in the game, and Forge decided that that stone will be able to make the best tools weapons and armor in game.
 

warfighter67

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
238
0
0
If anyone was wondering about how explosion resistant the stronger XY blocks are btw (plates/shields) they're effectively stone against a nuke. If you want to be nuke-proof stick to iridium-reinforced stone or titanium blocks.

I surrounded a nuke in the shields inside my nuke room (that has shields for walls and reinforced stone behind it) and without covering the nuke, my base gets destroyed. When I cover the nuke, my base stays fine except for 95% of my nuke room LOL[DOUBLEPOST=1356967209][/DOUBLEPOST]
Absolutely do not want GT-Al to be matched to Xy-Al. The intended rarity of GTs version (its not even a direct ore and must be processed from other things) is in serious conflict with the actual commonality of Xycrafts version.

This is the weakness of dictionary matching of ores, and can already see the issue between GT and RP rubies and emeralds. RP expects, and gives an approprite valie in crafting while GT expects they are far rarer and gives them such value.

Its as if some mod declared something called diamonds to spawn in one of every three blocks in the game, and Forge decided that that stone will be able to make the best tools weapons and armor in game.
I am able to make unlimited MFSU thanks to RP rubies and sapphires lol.