Search results

  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
  1. B

    Removing TileEntities?

    Alright, I'll try that plugin. And I put it back in, used worldedit to fly around and removed those entities. Thanks!
  2. B

    Removing TileEntities?

    Hello all, Recently I updated my server and removed certain mods such as GasCraft. Me, expecting forge to intelligently remove data that is unneeded, kept with the world. We updated from TPPI 0.3.0 to 1.0.2, but this doens't have much to do with the modpack. However, there is a problem...
  3. B

    Full LWC Config for FTB Techworld2 1.1.1

    Alright guys so I made an LWC config(core.yml) for Techworld2. There may be a few things that you'd want to change, but I thought I'd share this with everybody since it is a pain to write one. I pasted it it at here, or: http://pastebin.com/Dkm5Fu0h
  4. B

    Problem Java out of memory error: unable to create new native thread

    Yes, prominecraft host runs multicraft as its interface. Is that relevant to the situation?
  5. B

    Problem Java out of memory error: unable to create new native thread

    The host configured it as is. I'm not sure I can change it.
  6. B

    Problem Java out of memory error: unable to create new native thread

    I am running an FTB Unleashed 1.1.7 server with all mods enabled on 5G of RAM, hosted by prominecrafthost. Recently(a few hours ago) the server started crashing and popping out the error http://pastebin.com/BxA This is the crash report: http://pastebin.com/BxAc5N2p As said above, the server has...
  7. B

    Unix FTB blackscreen crash at startup

    Many UNIX users are having blackscreen crashes upon startup, and are unable to enter the game. This is due to lwjgl not being updated to the latest version. this is a good tutorial from mcforums: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/1625325-how-to-update-lwjgl/ As most UNIX users are rather...
  8. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    He didn't remove the code, only removed the "trigger".
  9. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    kinda straying from the topic, but there is bukkitforge, the compatibility layer between bukkit and forge(no duh)
  10. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    I love both mods, that is what makes it so heartbreaking to find how different the devs are. Whereas mDiyo is rather reasonable, greg has a rather "i don't give a d*mn attitude" towards players. But the fact that it forces forge to load gregtech first, then check specifically for tconstruct...
  11. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    how is this not malicious? malicious software by definition is code that interferes with a computer's common function, and/or sends personal data to unauthorized parties. Greg, by inserting his little piece of code here, intentionally interfered with the computer's function. Therefore it is...
  12. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    1) I support many of them, in fact, most. But I do not support nerfing the most basic of tools that nobody wants to keep. It makes unnecessary parts of the game(excessive crafting) in the beginning very tedious. 2) Some idiots still do 3) you yourself are one, so don't talk trash on ftb users...
  13. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    It used to be great, now it actually is tedious.
  14. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    I may have illustrated a little less than i would have preferred. In my later reply, I say in order to lengthen gameplay, mildly nerfing items and recipe outputs is a good way. Please don't cherrypick my words as to prove your point. Another thing, it seems that you support greg nerfing...
  15. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    in my understandding, the point of gregtech is to lengthen gameplay. mild nerfing does help a lot, but you do have a point.
  16. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    My point is that railcraft changing vanilla recipes has a good reason, whereas gregtech does not.
  17. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    maybe many of us have handled this immaturely, but none even close to greg. it really is a shame, i liked most of the addons that gregtech added to ic2. I believe most people(except those die-hard idiots) also feel similarly and with good reason, railcraft alters things so that it is easier...
  18. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    1. greg doesn't respect other mods, he depends on them. gregtech doesn't work if ic2 isn't installed. 2. even if what mDiyo did was wrong, and he should have added a config, it provides absolutely no ground for gregorius to go and crash clients because of a tempter tantrum, caused by someone...
  19. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    The ic2 forum is basically the start of the conflict and greg's downward spiral. If that place has ceased fire, there isn't much of a point to continue since we already know what the truth is. I agree, although it does seem that the majority is on mDiyo's side, and only a few die-hard idiots...
  20. B

    Greg Tech opinion discussions go here

    ok guys, the IC2 forum has already ceased-fire. Why not do the same here? It's clear as day that greg did put malicious code in, and it's clear the mDiyo had the right to override. What greg did was wrong, period.