Search results

  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
  1. G

    Windows .jar Can't use portable Java64 anymore?

    I'll have to try it. The project page says either jPortable or a local java installation is required, I'm hoping that doesn't mean it searches for local Java like the default FTB.
  2. G

    Windows .jar Can't use portable Java64 anymore?

    Seems to be the case. Hopefully some devs will see this, it seems 1.3 messed it up for us portable users (I launched 1.2.6 with the original batch file and it used jPortable)
  3. G

    Windows .jar Can't use portable Java64 anymore?

    Didn't work, here is the whole console up to that error: AnalyticsBackgroundThread started FTBLaunch starting up (version 1.3.3) Java version: 1.7.0_45 Java vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Users\*******\Downloads\CommonFiles\Java64 Java specification: Java Virtual Machine...
  4. G

    Windows .jar Can't use portable Java64 anymore?

    I'll try that tomorrow then, hoping it works. If not, I guess I could keep my server running all day and join it, should negate some RAM limitations.
  5. G

    Windows .jar Can't use portable Java64 anymore?

    I'm trying to run FTB at school (the teacher is 100% fine with this as long as I'm done), and the computers only have 32 bit java. Not an enjoyable experience when FTB has to stop due to RAM limitations. Last semester, I installed portable JRE 64, and with a simple .bat file got FTB to launch...
Top Bottom