Rotarycraft; Reactorcraft install on a world being played

  • Please make sure you are posting in the correct place. Server ads go here and modpack bugs go here
  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
X

xKazlyn

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
83
0
0
Basically my question is; if i add these mods will i still be able to use my current world? I'm on DW20 1.0.16 for Minecraft 1.6.4, ore gen won't be a problem, unless they don't play well with mystcraft. I only have gravestone and damage indicators installed, with computer craft, biomes o plenty and a couple of other mods removed. Thanks for everyone's help :)
 
Yes, unless there are ID conflicts (which means your client would not launch) And you need the ores from reactorcraft. There is no reason for it not to work
 
As far as I know, you'll be fine. As a warning, it's a possibility you may run into an issue with qCraft being present, which can cause a crash when hitting "u" over an item in NEI.
 
ThatOneSlowking said:
Yes, unless there are ID conflicts (which means your client would not launch) And you need the ores from reactorcraft. There is no reason for it not to work
Click to expand...

No problem with ID conflicts, thanks for the info :)
Padfoote said:
As far as I know, you'll be fine. As a warning, it's a possibility you may run into an issue with qCraft being present, which can cause a crash when hitting "u" over an item in NEI.
Click to expand...

I'll make sure to put that into consideration, qcraft was never one of my big mods, so i may just remove it.
 
Something that people aren't mentioning is that ReactorCraft has ores, unlike RotaryCraft. You'll need to run retrogen on those ores, but ReactorCraft has support for this.
xKazlyn said:
~I'll make sure to put that into consideration, qcraft was never one of my big mods, so i may just remove it.
Click to expand...
I'd suggest running a test of this first. I've used qCraft since I got it and it's worked fine with everything so far(no crashes with NEI on my end). It's a odd crash, and one that hits some and others don't get, so YMMV.
 
YX33A said:
Something that people aren't mentioning is that ReactorCraft has ores, unlike RotaryCraft. You'll need to run retrogen on those ores, but ReactorCraft has support for this.
Click to expand...

ThatOneSlowking said:
And you need the ores from reactorcraft.
Click to expand...

It was mentioned. ;)

(And the avatar change had me confused as to who was posting yet again)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThatOneSlowking and Not_Steve
YX33A said:
Something that people aren't mentioning is that ReactorCraft has ores, unlike RotaryCraft. You'll need to run retrogen on those ores, but ReactorCraft has support for this.

I'd suggest running a test of this first. I've used qCraft since I got it and it's worked fine with everything so far(no crashes with NEI on my end). It's a odd crash, and one that hits some and others don't get, so YMMV.
Click to expand...
ThatOneSlowking said:
Yes, unless there are ID conflicts (which means your client would not launch) And you need the ores from reactorcraft. There is no reason for it not to work
Click to expand...
[DOUBLEPOST=1397611281][/DOUBLEPOST]
Padfoote said:
It was mentioned. ;)

(And the avatar change had me confused as to who was posting yet again)
Click to expand...
You
You bloody ninja
I failed so jard
 
YX33A said:
....It's a odd crash, and one that hits some and others don't get, so YMMV.
Click to expand...
There's a joke here somewhere about putting a qCraft mod into a pack, and at a given interval a radioactive atom may or may not decay, and it if does, a bug is introduced into the code which causes a crash. And until the modpack is run and directly observed it persists in a state of both bugginess and nonbugginess.

Are we being qTrolled?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reika, casilleroatr, Padfoote and 1 other person
Pyure said:
There's a joke here somewhere about putting a qCraft mod into a pack, and at a given interval a radioactive atom may or may not decay, and it if does, a bug is introduced into the code which causes a crash. And until the modpack is run and directly observed it persists in a state of both bugginess and nonbugginess.

Are we being qTrolled?
Click to expand...
DAMN YOU SCHRODINGER! FINALLY THIS MAKES SENSE AND DAMN YOU AND YOUR DEAD BODY TO HELL!
Nah, just kidding, it's bad enough he's constantly spinning in his grave, though it's also a shame we aren't harnessing that power. Poor schmuck wanted to show how stupid Quantum Physics is. That was the whole "cat-in-a-box-both-dead-and-alive" thing was, some parady of Quantum Physics to show that the cat has to be either alive or dead, and that anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. And thus Schrodinger was a fool, since his "Experiment" showed that there really was a superposition of states and that the observer effect is needed to prove if the cat is or isn't dead.
...Mind you, the cat could have been the observer in his experiment as it was written.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pyure
Pyure said:
A cat's attention will always be directed towards everything except the one thing you want it to observe.
Click to expand...
All it has to do is be aware of it's on existence, and thus, whether or not it's dead. If the superpostion of the radioactive decay is known, then this is because the cat isn't dead. If it isn't know, someone is getting written up for animal abuse leading to death.
 
I've owned cats over the last few decades and although we refer to dogs having owners. With cats, it's that cats have servants/slaves that look after them paw on paw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YX33A
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom