Reactorcraft Help?

  • Please make sure you are posting in the correct place. Server ads go here and modpack bugs go here
  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
A

Ascend

Guest
Hello again,

I seem to be having trouble setting up my first HTGR from Reactorcraft. The problem is that my reactor will not heat up, no matter what I try. The setup shown in the following pictures has:
a) sufficient TRISO fuel and CO2 gas
b) all faces of the reactor/CO2 heat exchangers covered
c) total of 4 reactor cores and 4 heat exchangers (I know this is a bad ratio)



The reactor never gets above ~80 degrees, which is a rather large problem considering you need ~800 degree operating temperature.

Any help is appreciated, thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 5.23.23 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 5.23.23 PM.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 118
  • Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 5.22.58 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 5.22.58 PM.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 110
  • Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 5.24.32 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 5.24.32 PM.png
    374 KB · Views: 103

Wagon153

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
3,148
-3
1
You need more TRISO fuel. The more TRISO fuel in the cores, the hotter it will get. Ideally, you'd fill it up to the brim.

Stuff is cheap to make anyway.

You'll also get more heat if you instead surround a single heat exchanger with the reactor cores.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aetherpirate
A

Ascend

Guest
The more TRISO fuel in the cores, the hotter it will get.
From the reading I have done, the reactor temperature will not depend on the amount of fuel in the core. This can be confirmed as I filled the reactor up right after I posted this, and it still has an average temperature of what seems to be about 90 degrees.

The reactor has a passive 7% chance each tick to add 20 degrees of heat to the reactor. This chance is (I believe) independent of the amount of fuel in the reactor.

You'll also get more heat if you instead surround a single heat exchanger with the reactor cores.
I do not believe this matters, as the temperature of the reactor core itself does no reach high temperatures. Surrounding a heat exchanger with 8 reactors at 80 degrees will not achieve the ~800 degrees I require.

Thank you for your suggestions though.
 
A

Ascend

Guest
I apologize, but after reading a bit of the source that @Reika so graciously made available to us, I am realizing that @Wagon153 is correct.
The reactor will have a chance each tick to add 20 to the temperature of the reactor, and this chance depends on the reactor size as shown below.

if (size >= 128)
return 1; //20
else if (size >= 72)
return 2; //12
else if (size >= 48)
return 3; //8
else if (size >= 36)
return 4; //8
else if (size >= 24)
return 6;
else if (size >= 12)
return 4;
else if (size >= 6)
return 2;
else
return 1;

@Reika Kalseki, 2015

I believe "size" refers to the total amount of reactor cores attached to one another.
 

Wagon153

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
3,148
-3
1
I apologize, but after reading a bit of the source that @Reika so graciously made available to us, I am realizing that @Wagon153 is correct.
The reactor will have a chance each tick to add 20 to the temperature of the reactor, and this chance depends on the reactor size as shown below.

if (size >= 128)
return 1; //20
else if (size >= 72)
return 2; //12
else if (size >= 48)
return 3; //8
else if (size >= 36)
return 4; //8
else if (size >= 24)
return 6;
else if (size >= 12)
return 4;
else if (size >= 6)
return 2;
else
return 1;

@Reika Kalseki, 2015

I believe "size" refers to the total amount of reactor cores attached to one another.
Glad you figured it out. :) Also, my second tip was more directed towards once you managed to get it to heat up. It of course wouldn't help if it wasn't heating up in the first place.