In case you don't know how a CRCS reactor works, you cool the reactor with cooling cells, which then get sent to other reactors to cool off.
After many failed attempts to get one working, I'm trying again now that AE systems can recognise NBT data. I've got a fuzzy import bus taking the hot cells out of the reactor. However, i'm not sure how to configure it to do what I want. I'm not sure what 'Damage comparison: Split at xyz%' means. I've set it to various values, and tried cells with varying amounts of damage, but each time the cells are always pulled out of the reactor. I could use a precision import bus, but i'd rather avoid have the hot cells pulled out at a specific damage value (though with AE i'm not sure if it makes any difference). In any case, has anyone actually tried this before? I don't know if they have.
EDIT: As a side note, plutonium is actually worth using now. It now has double the eu/t of uranium and same efficiency scaling as uranium (as it was originally). However, the base heat output has been lowered from 10 to 8 - its now exactly double what you'd get from the same setup with uranium. This means there's no reason not to use it in a CRCS setup (that is, if you can actually find that much plutonium to begin with).
After many failed attempts to get one working, I'm trying again now that AE systems can recognise NBT data. I've got a fuzzy import bus taking the hot cells out of the reactor. However, i'm not sure how to configure it to do what I want. I'm not sure what 'Damage comparison: Split at xyz%' means. I've set it to various values, and tried cells with varying amounts of damage, but each time the cells are always pulled out of the reactor. I could use a precision import bus, but i'd rather avoid have the hot cells pulled out at a specific damage value (though with AE i'm not sure if it makes any difference). In any case, has anyone actually tried this before? I don't know if they have.
EDIT: As a side note, plutonium is actually worth using now. It now has double the eu/t of uranium and same efficiency scaling as uranium (as it was originally). However, the base heat output has been lowered from 10 to 8 - its now exactly double what you'd get from the same setup with uranium. This means there's no reason not to use it in a CRCS setup (that is, if you can actually find that much plutonium to begin with).