Search results

There wasn't, and isn't one. Ok, pay attention class. IC2 adds bronze. (yes, IC2 was first) Forestry uses a different recipe. Greg nerfs bronze output "bcuz IC2 ownz bronze duude" (Note that this is done even with the existence of a config option for forestry to not add its recipe) Greg gets...

It doesn't need to be there now to be added at any time.

Except: It's not a problem except in Greg's mind Again, why should it crash because I as a user have chosen to add a mod that changes the matter fabricator recipe?

It wasn't overriding a GT recipe in the first place. It was adding a new recipe for 1 wood -> 4 planks. The existing 1 wood -> 2 planks, 1 wood + saw -> 4 planks recipes from GT remained wholly in place while the original 1 wood -> 4 planks was deleted by GT. Not that Greg has any...

Yeah well, bdubs doesn't even play it right now, and it's sort of an open question if they'll be coming back anytime soon. Generik does do his bees, but hes probably the only one all week on the server. I'd put that at not changing until an official FTB for 1.6 is out, and I'd put it pretty...

But, there's not. Scaffolding Tin buckets Higher output bronze All the IC2 recipes now requiring plates (Again, before you try and point some out to me, here is the complete unedited config files as generated by GregTech. If it's not in this file, it doesn't work)...

Greg lies. Sometimes he only lies by saying "it was always there, go update to this version I just uploaded 30 seconds ago", othertimes its just a flat out bald faced lie, but he lies a lot. And he's lying there.

It's not moot, because FTB doesn't change config files other than setting block and item ids. So if it ever does update, all these nerfs will be in place. Hell, if you install 0.7 of wgt right this second, you will have the GT/Tinkers ingot dupe.

No, it is not. Here is the complete section of the config, nothing removed, only some trues set to false. general { B:ConnectedMachineCasingTextures=true B:Debug=false B:Debug2=false B:ShowCapes=true B:TooEasyMode=false B:WoodNeedsSawForCrafting=false...

Try it. It does not mean that 3+1=4 To add to the list though: Where's the config to return machine block, re battery, circuits, etc to base-IC2 standard (i.e., not requiring plates)

Individual people may not use both mods, but both mods appear in the same FTB pack. Only one of the mods interferes with other mods though. On the other hand, you're simply wrong. Really, everybody on our server uses both (or uses Dartcraft instead of Tinkers, which is even less complex)...

No, it's not fixed. Because the root problem isn't the intentional crash. It's the thinking that a modder can release such an intentional crash in the first place.

You are in error. That list is for 1.4. I know this because absolutely none of those mods are signed, so they cannot be verified. forestry-A.2.2.8.3 industrialcraft-2_1.117.385-lf Thaumcraft3.0.5e Railcraft_1.5.2-7.3.0.0.0

List them. No hand waving.

Actually, no. It has code to detect if a signed java jar file is modified. Given the context of "Minecraft, a game", such a feature exceeds necessity and CovertJaguar is at fault for adding it. It's also AFAIK only functional in 1.4, because it only works with one mod, which hasn't updated...

So does a creeper. And just like a creeper, the bees only did it while the player was near. Greg intentionally terminated the Minecraft in a crash and then publicly claimed the crash was caused by Tinker's Construct. He and his sycophants are now retconning the events to try and claim it was...

That's nice. That's your opinion. It's one ignoring the facts on hand, but keep at it nontheless! No. Sengir did some "bad things", but there was no blowing up of worlds and nothing comparable to intentionally crashing the game like Greg has done.

Key points: The "FTB Team" doesn't. Some members of the team do. GT pre 3.09 and 3.09+ make radically different changes to mods external to GT. Pre 3.09 they're sensible (base IC2 uu-matter is a problem) and/or wrapped in config options to turn off. There's really only one example failing...

Debatable, but probably not. She certainly has a right to stop (re-)distribution of that work, including direct modifications. She almost certainly does not have any right to stop decompiles, black box reimplementations, etc.

Which strengthens the argument that the laser shouldn't be providing silk touch ores in the first place.