Search results

Okay, so an update checker mod is being developed by the PT. Its name is UpToDate, as you can infer from the title. This is the suggestions and ideas thread. I'll update this once we have a full release ready. TODO: Update with more info

That's a given. :p Also, I'll start a thread for the new version checker idea. One second. EDIT: Thread made.

traj's super-helpful list of actions that *should* work: Block anyone from going in or out of <PLAYERNAME>'s house Take notes of who goes in or out of <PLAYERNAME>'s house Burn the forest, a known hangout of the wolves, in the night Burn the house of <PLAYERNAME> (town kill method, use only when...

Toss trajing into the woods, a known hangout of the wolves, and watch for wolves

Look. We've come to a calm and reasoned compromise that everyone's happy with, now could we all please stop resurrecting an argument that won't lead anywhere? Mods - I'd suggest locking this thread. There isn't really anything to be gained by letting this argument go on.

Conduct an investigation to attempt to discover the wolven/non-wolven status of everyone without involving any anime characters

Conduct an investigation to attempt to discover the wolven/non-wolven status of everyone

There'd still only be one "correct" solution. ⅓ + ⅓ + ⅓ will always equal 1, no matter whatever something you run it on says.

If our brain fundamentally operated on logic, then there would be no ethics problems, as logic would point to one (and only one) solution.

Until Lex decides to fix the JSON situation (and last I checked he was dead set on not fixing it), I'm not going to so much as attempt to write anything for 1.8. Any projects I'm doing are going to be on 1.7.

*an exact duplicate of the coin made with chocolate lands on Someone Else's head* *inserts chocolate coin*

Reika's heard that one before. He is still within his rights to forbid modification of the RoC balance. This is what pretty much every argument of mine can boil down to. If I'm still arguing for it, they're within their rights.

I'd like more responses to this. Also, after your first response, throw the following variables into the mix: Person A is poor Person B is rich Person C is middle-class

Quantum phenomena are actually pretty much as random as you can get, even more so than Random.org's system (although determinists contest this, but we won't open that can of worms).

This is somewhat true. Your decision-making capabilities are laces with emotion to discourage making the "wrong" choice, however this could be considered subconscious logic.

Yeeeaaah, this is more than slightly unorthodox. Next game shouldn't be as much as a train wreck though.* *may or may not be true

As for the (probably now buried) "You're just using a proxy to make you feel better" argument, why does that matter? In the end, all that matters is how you feel. I know that I would much rather just flip a coin than have to choose between choice A and choice B, both of which involve someone...

In theory, an AI can have feelings.

Wait, there's a discussion going on about this in Twitter?

Oh, on to more hypothetical situations, are we? Absolute logic != no morality. There is no fundamental tradeoff.