Search results

Yeah, the problem is, the way they check is they get what armor the player is wearing, not with a isWearing(Armor) kind of check, so ASMing into that method isn't an option

The events are called on the player, not the armor sets, the ghost player is a possibility though, and you could mix armor sets still, just have a list of what players are connected to that stand. That would cover all effects, the problem is that when say, a player tries to do something that...

Cool suggestion, I have an idea for how you could do it, however the cross-mod compatibility is the hardest part because if they directly check whether the player has the armor set to do damage reduction then it will still give damage reduction. A possible alternative is to make a small API for...

I typed in but didn't send :(

I needed someone to stone and I had no info *shrug* Good game

True...Well then I'll just vote Spanks

If spanks is a Dragon then I guess I'll vote exedra

vote Spwn better than nothing

antismite the Epic 101

mhm, it can either be very good, or very bad

Also, to you're last commen, that is very impractical

^ You'd have to fork minetest for that

antismite trajing

I've already looked at it, and attempted modding it, suffice it to say I'm unimpressed Lua is a great programming and scripting lang, but if I want a high performance mod, lua ain't gonna cut it ^ This is entirely true, let me put it this way, the MC community is spoiled when it comes to how...

Of course it isn't impossible, we have turing-complete programming languages and brains :P It does mean that it will be much harder. But yes, MCPE had much simpler mods when the symbols were stripped. And I'm deobfuscating some 1.9 snapshots with Enigma now, and I can tell you it is fairly easy...

vote nobooty

40 @Padfoote is messing with yall :p

o/ Welcome to the forums, about your in-progress mod, is there anywhere to see the source or even a design document? I'd like to take a look :)

in

EC is awesome :3